đŸŽ„ Cette Ă©cole qui dĂ©truit – Le harcĂšlement scolaire, partie 2

PrĂ©cĂ©demment, nous avons tentĂ© de tracer un diaporama de ce qu’est le harcĂšlement scolaire, quel est son ampleur, qui sont les personnes les plus ciblĂ©es, quelles en sont les consĂ©quences ?

La vidéo sur Youtube : 

La vidéo sur Peertube : 

La vidéo sur Vimeo : 

 

Ce faisant, nous sommes demeurĂ©s en surface : nous n’avons pas encore creusĂ© la question des causes et facteurs alimentant ces harcĂšlements.

Les phĂ©nomĂšnes de harcĂšlement sont souvent abordĂ©s en portant focus sur les harceleurs et la personne harcelĂ©e, voire Ă©ventuellement les tĂ©moins (les autres Ă©lĂšves), sans tenir compte, ou si peu, du rĂŽle de l’environnement social. Or, cela est central : le harcĂšlement scolaire a des ramifications bien plus large qu’il n’y paraĂźt, alimentĂ© par des prĂ©jugĂ©s gĂ©nĂ©raux et par des contextes contrĂŽlants dans les Ă©coles, surtout au collĂšge. Ces contextes contrĂŽlants, c’est-Ă -dire quand l’école devient compĂ©titive, avec des rapports enseignants/Ă©lĂšves trĂšs verticaux, accroissent les tensions, renforcent les logiques de dominations entre pairs : dominer l’autre, en le dĂ©valorisant pour se valoriser soi ; le punir, parce qu’il ne conforme pas Ă  la norme et menace le statut quo.

Dans certains cas, ce sont directement les adultes qui participent Ă  augmenter, voire Ă  dĂ©clencher des harcĂšlements entre Ă©lĂšves, avec notamment ce qu’on nomme les humiliations scolaires, phĂ©nomĂšne connexe au harcĂšlement scolaire.

Ces contextes contrĂŽlants que nous allons approfondir dans cette partie ne renforcent pas seulement les tensions dans les Ă©coles, mais tout autant sapent les besoins des Ă©lĂšves, leur estime personnelle, leur motivation pour les apprentissages, etc. Si vous connaissez dĂ©jĂ  nos rĂ©alisations sur le Hacking Social, vous avez sans doute dĂ©jĂ  devinĂ© que nous allons parler d’autodĂ©termination 😉

📖 En toute puissance, manuel d’autodĂ©termination radicale

Dans la troisiÚme partie, nous aborderons les fausses « bonnes » solutions pour lutter contre les harcÚlements scolaires, et vous le verrez, on en aura des choses à démystifier.

D’ici là, prenez soin de vous !

 


Bibliographie


  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy‐enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British journal of educational psychology.
  • Bowen, F., & Levasseur, C. (2016). Exploring the causal links between the perception of the socio-educational environment and the aggressive and prosocial behavior of students at the end of primary school. International journal on school climate and violence prevention
  • Bradshaw, J., Crous, G., Rees, G., & Turner, N. (2017). Comparing children’s experiences of schools-based bullying across countries. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 171-180.
  • Carra, C., Garnier, A., Col, C., Carnel, B., & Mas, M. (2006). Les violences Ă  l’école primaire vues par les Ă©lĂšves: une face peu connue du phĂ©nomĂšne. Spirale-Revue de recherches en Ă©ducation, 37(1), 49-62.
  • Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2023). Autonomy-supportive teaching enhances prosocial and reduces antisocial behavior via classroom climate and psychological needs: A multilevel randomized control intervention. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Applications of flow in human development and education (pp. 153-172). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., & Marijn Poortvliet, P. (2012). Achievement goals in educational contexts: A social psychology perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182.
  • Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self‐determination theory perspective. Journal of personality, 62(1), 119-142.
  • Debarbieux, E., Alessandrin, A., Dagorn, J., & Gaillard, O. (2018). Les violences sexistes Ă  l’école. Une oppression viriliste. 0. The European Journal of Public Health, 25(suppl_2), 61-64
  • Debarbieux : L’oppression viriliste et la violence scolaire, Le cafĂ© pĂ©dagogique, 2018
  • Demaray, M. K., Malecki, C. K., Secord, S. M., & Lyell, K. M. (2013). Agreement among students’, teachers’, and parents’ perceptions of victimization by bullying. Children and Youth Services Review
  • DeRosier, M. E., Kupersmidt, T. B., & Patterson, C. J. (1994). Children’s academic and behavioral adjustment as a function of the chronicity and proximity of peer rejection. Child Development
  • Ferguson, Y. L., Kasser, T., & Jahng, S. (2011). Differences in life satisfaction and school satisfaction among adolescents from three nations: The role of perceived autonomy support. Journal of research on Adolescence
  • Gagne, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.
  • Galand, B., Baudoin, N., & Hospel, V. (2014).  » School and classroom effects on bullying and peer victimization. In 28th International Congress of Applied Psychology.
  • Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafreniere, M. K. (2012) Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 77–95.
  • Gnambs, T., & Hanfstingl, B. (2015). The decline of academic motivation during adolescence: An accelerated longitudinal cohort analysis on the effect of psychological need satisfaction. Educational Psychology
  • Gordon, A. R., Conron, K. J., Calzo, J. P., White, M. T., Reisner, S. L., & Austin, S. B. (2018). Gender expression, violence, and bullying victimization: Findings from probability samples of high school students in 4 US school districts. Journal of School Health, 88(4), 306–314.
  • Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory, 135-161.
  • Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: an experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(5), 890.
  • Hagenauer, G., & Hascher, T. (2010). Learning enjoyment in early adolescence. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(6), 495-516.
  • Hazler, R. J., Miller, D. L., Carney, J. V., & Green, S. (2001). Adult recognition of school bullying situations. Educational Research, 43(2), 133-146.
  • Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., & Tolan, P. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 59–81.
  • Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293.
  • Jang, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 798.
  • Klapp, A. (2015). Does grading affect educational attainment? A longitudinal study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 302-323.
  • Kleinkorres, R., Stang‐Rabrig, J., & McElvany, N. (2023). The longitudinal development of students’ well‐being in adolescence: The role of perceived teacher autonomy support. Journal of Research on Adolescence.
  • Lam, S. F., Law, W., Chan, C. K., Wong, B. P., & Zhang, X. (2015). A latent class growth analysis of school bullying and its social context: the self-determination theory perspective. School psychology quarterly, 30(1), 75.
  • Merle, P. (2017). La classe: un lieu de violence scolaire. Eduquer, 12-14.Merrell, K. W., Gueldner, B. A., Ross, S. W., & Isava, D. M. (2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 26–42
  • Merle, P. (2015). L’Ă©lĂšve humiliĂ©: l’Ă©cole, un espace de non-droit?. Puf.
  • Montero-Carretero, C., Barbado, D., & CervellĂł, E. (2020). Predicting bullying through motivation and teaching styles in physical education. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(1), 87.
  • Morgan, E. M., & Davis-Delano, L. R. (2016). Heterosexual marking and binary cultural conceptions of sexual orientation. Journal of Bisexuality, 16(2), 125-143.
  • Mulvey, K. L., & Killen, M. (2015). Challenging gender stereotypes: Resistance and exclusion. Child Development, 86(3), 681-694.
  • Newman, R. S., & Murray, B. J. (2005). How students and teachers view the seriousness of peer harassment: When is it appropriate to seek help?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 347.
  • Payet, J. P. (1997). Le «sale boulot»: Division morale du travail dans un collĂšge en banlieue. In Les Annales de la recherche urbaine (Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 19-31). PersĂ©e-Portail des revues scientifiques en SHS.
  • Pepler, D., Jiang, D., Craig, W., & Connolly, J. (2008). Developmental trajectories of bullying and associated factors. Child development, 79(2), 325-338.
  • Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School psychology international, 21(1), 22-36.
  • Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal, 106, 225–236.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford publications.
  • Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2009). How k-12 teachers can put self-determination theory principles into practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 145–154.
  • Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Cortisol reactivity to a teacher’s motivating style: The biology of being controlled versus supporting autonomy. Motivation and emotion, 35, 63-74.
  • Roth, G. (2008). Perceived parental conditional regard and autonomy support as predictors of young adults’ self- versus other-oriented prosocial tendencies. Journal of Personality, 76, 513–534.
  • Roth, G., Assor, A., Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The negative emotional and behavioral consequences of parental conditional regard: Comparing positive conditional regard, negative conditional regard, and autonomy support as parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1119–1142
  • Roth, G., Kanat‐Maymon, Y., & Bibi, U. (2011). Prevention of school bullying: The important role of autonomy‐supportive teaching and internalization of pro‐social values. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 654-666.
  • Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Glick, P., & Phelan, J. E. (2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 167-227). Academic Press.
  • SAINT MARTIN C., de, 2012, Nommer les violences scolaires. Des incivilitĂ©s au harcĂšlement scolaire, La lettre de l’enfance et de l’adolescence, 87, 1, 119- 126.
  • Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. (2006). Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, gender differences, and correlates. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression
  • Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Nakamoto, J., & Toblin, R. L. (2005). Victimization in the peer group and children’s academic functioning. Journal of educational psychology, 97(3), 425.
  • Smith, P. K., Talamelli, L., Cowie, H., Naylor, P., & Chauhan, P. (2004). Profiles of non‐victims, escaped victims, continuing victims and new victims of school bullying. British journal of educational psychology, 74(4), 565-581.
  • Tenenbaum, L. S., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., & Parris, L. (2011). Coping strategies and perceived effectiveness in fourth through eighthgrade victims of bullying. School Psychology International, 32(3), 263–287.
  • Tolmatcheff, C., HĂ©noumont, KlĂ©e, E., & Galand, B. (2019). StratĂ©gies et rĂ©actions des victimes et de leur entourage face au harcĂšlement scolaire: une Ă©tude rĂ©trospective. Psychologie française, 64(4), 391-407.
  • Tolmatcheff, C., Galand, B., & Roskam, I. (2018). DiversitĂ© des caractĂ©ristiques des harceleurs et implications pour l’intervention en milieu scolaire. Enfance, (3), 471-490.

  • Vaillancourt, T., Trinh, V., McDougall, P., Duku, E., Cunningham, L., Cunningham, C. & Short, K. (2010). Optimizing population screening of bullying in school-aged children. Journal of School Violence, 9(3), 233-250.
  • Vaillancourt, T., Duku, E., Becker, S., Schmidt, L. A., Nicol, J., Muir, C., & MacMillan, H. (2011). Peer victimization, depressive symptoms, and high salivary cortisol predict poorer memory in children. Brain and Cognition, 77(2), 191-199.
  • Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 157-176.
  • Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 157-176.
  • Van der Toorn, J., Pliskin, R., & Morgenroth, T. (2020). Not quite over the rainbow: The unrelenting and insidious nature of heteronormative ideology. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens,W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 468–483.
  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: a comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental psychology, 41(4), 672.
  • UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending School violence and bullying. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2019
  • Who – Spotlight on Adolescent Health and Well-Being, 2020
  • Zullig, K. J., Huebner, E. S., & Patton, J. M. (2011). Relationships among school climate domains and school satisfaction. Psychology in the Schools, 48(2), 133–145.

 


Documents vidéo


  • « Prof Richard Ryan on Motivation and wellness in school: Research from self-determination theory», EducationMelbourne 2023
  • «Eric Debarbieux – AmĂ©liorer le climat scolaire pour la rĂ©ussite de tous les Ă©lĂšves », INSPÉ Lille HdF, 2020
  • « HarcĂšlement scolaire : la faute aux adultes ? », EnvoyĂ© SpĂ©cial, 2023
  • « HarcelĂ©e pendant toute ma scolaritĂ© » – La Maison des maternelles, 2021
  • « HarcĂšlement scolaire ces parents dĂ©noncent l’inaction de certains rectorats et chefs d’établissements », BFMTV, 2023
  • « HarcĂšlement scolaire le papa de Nicolas sort du silence», C Ă  vous, 2023
  • « HarcĂšlement scolaire ; aprĂšs le suicide de Nicolas une lettre du rectorat fait scandale », France Info, 2023
  • « Campagne Non au harcĂšlement – Le harcĂšlement, si on n’en parle pas, ça ne s’arrĂȘte pas », 2015
  • « École : en finir avec le harcĂšlement », de Gicqueau & Oultaf, 2023

Vous pouvez nous soutenir via :

C’est grĂące Ă  vous si nous pouvons persĂ©vĂ©rer, merci x 1000 !

 

Chayka Hackso Écrit par :

Gardienne de l'Ăźle d'Horizon, grande prĂȘtresse du culte du caillou. Si vous souhaitez nous soutenir c'est par ici : paypal ♄ ou tipeee ou ♣ liberapay ; pour communiquer ou avoir des news du site/de la chaĂźne, c'est par lĂ  :

Soyez le premier Ă  commenter

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

LIVRES